RAZD Said...

Quote
Now it's my turn: if the first life did begin in a 'primordial soup' - a mixture of amino acids that contain all the basic ingredients of life - do you think that evolution, the change in hereditary traits in populations from generation to generation, cannot account for the diversity of life we know, including - but not limited to - humans?


"'...primordial soup' - a mixture of amino acids that contain all the basic ingredients of life..."
—There are several enormous presumptions behind this statement. Do you see them?

"...evolution, the change in hereditary traits in populations from generation to generation..."
—Ironically, evolutionists resort not only to changing definitions, but changing history.


Your question is so full of presumptions and departures from classic definitions that it is not answerable without the imposition of vast assumptions. Nevertheless, I'll try to accommodate by further explanation.

First. The laws of basic chemistry prohibit the formation of ever increasing complexity. Instead, the laws are intelligently designed so as to attain stability (as I explained previously). This is a brick wall that evolutionists do not see.

Second. Once complex forms of life were created, they did adapt. This process of adaptation is not classic evolution, although evolutionists (like you) are currently attempting to change related definitions of evolution to look more like adaptation to keep from looking so stupid (called "a retreat"). Adaptation is based on very complex mechanisms that are "built-into" the organism requiring vastly-increased complexity in it's original design. This mechanism is not "error-based" like classic "evolution". Adaptive processes require a design incorporating the concept of anticipation ("looking ahead") which matter simply does not have.

For example, if father works hard physically or spends a lot of time in the sun, he will tend to have children who are bigger or more tan, yet these changes are limited to confines defined in the original design. These are not error-based processes. These are adaptive processes that are built into the organism; Processes which are very complex.

We really have to discern between the two in order to have intelligent conversation.

Furthermore, we have to ask questions that are not filled with presumptions. If we do, we will arrive at assumptive conclusions, such as evolution - As defined before RAZD and friends got their hands on it <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />.




The Captian
Today they call you "crazy". Tomorrow they call you "ahead of your time."
Global Skywatch Learn about Chemtrails - You're breathing them now!
OnlyTheBestHerbs.com World-class supplements
Mercury Talk Why you are sick.
OneUp Domains Domains, Hosting, Email
1-800-358-4278 (U.S. & Canada)