Hi CTD, let's be clear:

Quote
I believe a number of scientists over the years have indeed undertaken to prove the validity of their theories.
You were not asked what you believe, that has already been demonstrated to be a rather remarkable unreliable system for validating claims, particularly your own.

Even showing that some other scientists have "undertaken to prove the validity of their theories" does not demonstrate that there are ANY theories that have been proven in any science known to man. Further proving the validity does not prove the theory, just that it has not been invalidated ... and you also provided no names, no theories, and most especially, no evidence for any such claimed undertakings.

Note that the validity of evolution has been "proven" -- it does explain the evidence of life as we know it, particularly in specific instances where we have seen actual speciation and actual change in the hereditary traits in populations from generation to generation, so when we apply your watered down, diluted and weakened standard of "proof" we see that it is one that is easy to meet.

In other words, what we have here classic CTD shinola, distraction, and misinformation and bluster.

In other words what we have here is another example of avoiding the issue and evidence of reality.

Enjoy.