Quote
Which is why you write such long posts to say so little?


Well, it's hard to resist the temptation of wasting your time as much as you waste mine on here! I'll take that as some constructive criticism and try and keep my posts more brief in future. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />.

Posting me links to "teach" me evolution (new ways to tell old lies) does not work RAZD. A lie is a lie, however you want to tell it. They claim scientific proof where none exists and then when cornered, they switch tactics and claim it's only a theory. Or explain the process differently and more "safely" when confronted with lack of evidence.

Quote
You will note that stasis is actually part of evolution. Any evidence of stasis is not evidence that evolution does not occur in other lineages or at other times.

It's not my reality, but everyone's ... well everyone that has an open mind and is willing to learn about the real world anyway. It's not a matter of faith but a matter of skepticism -- treating all beliefs with skepticism and testing them against the facts for reality.


Funny, you said my post was long but said very little, yet I had already described this very manner the evolutionist uses to claim "evolution", yet it seems no matter how much I say it, how long I say it, it still gets missed! But, you've just provided me with a perfect example! They'll resort back to ordinary observations showing little change, because they have no proof of anything more dramatic. They're pretty sneaky. But what else can they do? As they can't find the dramatic evidence required to show that all this originated from simple life, they'll sneak evolution into the same evidence that creation taught all along. And then claim that this is evolution and creation is bogus.

And this is your idea of having an open mind? Sounds like you opened your mind up so much your brain fell out! Do you suggest we do the same? Again, it is only the reality of the evolutionist who wants to believe all this resulted from chance happenings.

Quote
It's not a matter of faith but a matter of skepticism -- treating all beliefs with skepticism and testing them against the facts for reality.


If you treated evolution with half as much skepticism as you treat creation, you might actually start reversing the indoctrination. Unfortunately you cannot do so. You're hopelessly convinced, or at least lying to yourself and others. I think you'd rather believe an error for the rest of your life, rather than make such an admission. This is why the arguments will never cease.

Quote
Things that stand up to such testing:

Evolution
Geology
Astronomy
Physics
Archeology
Radiometric dating
Genetics
An old universe (at least 13.7 billion years old)
An old earth (at least 4.55 billion years old)
A long existence of life on earth (at least 3.5 billion years)


Things that stand up to wishful thinking and preconceived beliefs. What an evolution wants to believe, the evidence will be slotted into that and then we'll be told what they want us to hear and take onboard. Provide a list, provide a chart, provide some bias studies and interpretations, and you got proof evolution happened.

Quote
Things that do not stand up to testing:

A young earth
A global flood
A flat earth
A geocentric earth
Ignorance



lol SURPRISE SURPRISE!!!! Anything pointing towards intelligent design is ignored and pushed to one side (just as the evolutionary biologist admitted in a tele interview). where did you get the idea of a flat earth RAZD? Is this your best shot? Do you know the bible preached the earth was a sphere long before it was discovered? regardless of man's silly mistaken beliefs to the contrary for a long time there!

I'd say you'd be the perfect disciple for evolution. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/yourmedicine.gif" alt="" />