Quote
But they don't want to know the truth. They would rather ignore the real evidence, as CTD does when he focuses on the difference in size and completely ignores the difference in lung scales. It's called cognitive dissonance.


Which truth are you talking about RAZD. Reality? or YOUR reality? <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/alieneyes.gif" alt="" /> Evidence, if it existed in favour of evolution would (as I've repeated previously) have silenced all possibility of an argument/debate. It wouldn't exist because it would be insanity to argue about an established fact. In fact, if the evidence is really "out there" why are we all still searching for it? If it really existed, you guys would not be on here wasting your time trying to convince everybody of something evolution has proven all along. Debates don't exist when it comes to the earth being a sphere ( the bible had already told this all along) we know it is because of science/technology proving it. If I argued about it, you'd laugh and feel sorry for me and be done with it. Yet you're on here spouting and <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/taz.gif" alt="" /> and trying very very hard to convince us evolution has taken place, knowing full well there is a failure of substantial evidence that it ever has, which explains the insecurity and trying to legitimise why tax payers dollars are supporting a false belief system. Plain and simple, your superiors are working to do just the same. Coming to bias conclusions based on bias assumptions and working hard to convince anybody who will listen that it all took place according to "their theory". What's new?

Differences are no problem whatsoever, we see that in every aspect of life and within all kinds/species. You see enough of that in human beings alone. I defy you to find two human beings completely identical to eachother in every aspect. Even twins! You won't. What makes you think that differences within a kind defies what the creationist has always believed and taught? It doesn't. As I've said, the bible has already told us this. We've never had an issue with this but the evolutionist now tries to use the word "evolution" on everything. Because you cannot give any proof that simplicity has become complexity, then it's let's play on observable facts and call them all evolution because we have no proof of origins and hope to heck nobody finds this out.

I will ask you guys again to prove that simple celled organisms arose into the complex variations of life we see today. If you cannot do that, then tell me what you have left to argue about other than <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smilieworship.gif" alt="" /><img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/followtherules.gif" alt="" />? Since creationists already acknowledge variation within kinds and are open to certain traits becoming emphasized under certain conditions (but not observed to go out of the range of one kind becoming another and never has been observed and imagining it doesn't make it a fact or evidence it happened). Outside of this, it's all about creating a model that does it's best to exclude any idea of intelligent design and if any evolutionist does admit intelligence may have been involved, they then do their best to manipulate that "intelligence" into their own belief system.

They have told us a few things on this forum:
These are the various ways they have tried to explain why the fossil pictures have shown little to no sign of change and a few of those have been:

Evolution happens in different stages at different times. Evolution doesn't have to necessarily affect everything, it depends. Or evolution doesn't need to occur to everything in the way you imagine. Or, they may show little sign of change but are significantly different, showing evolution. Or you just don't understand the process of evolution. You're only looking at the guy who stayed at home, not the one who went around the world (this is in light that all the fossil pics given coincidentally were the guy that stayed at home, all the rest wondered around the world <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />).

It's not that we are focussing on the one who stayed at home, we haven't seen anything else, yet keep being told about it! They haven't got anything else. So instead, they are looking for something that hasn't (or cannot) be proven as a way of "proving" their theory. Or looking at the fossils and trying very very hard to exaggerate any differences and claiming evolution at all costs, in the light that it's much the same and is fully formed regardless of differences.

And this is their evidence for evolution. And we're supposed to be bowled over and <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/imnotworthy.gif" alt="" /> When it's nothing more than an anti-God, anti-bible plan disguised as "science", creating the truth killing virus "evolutionism" creating many victims and casualities across the world as a result <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/stretcher.gif" alt="" />.

"...avoid oppositions of science falsely so called, which some professing have erred concerning the faith." (I Timothy 6:20,21).