Congratulations RAZD, you have provided, once again, no substance <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> I'll return the compliment with a touch of entertainment attached.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl8SRrlbbN0

Quote
Unfortunately for you the real world is not in any way inhibited by your understanding of reality, particularly with what is involved in evolution. Let me know when you really want to talk about evolution instead of fantasies.


Unfortunately for you, the real world fails to provide you with the substantial proof you require to back your claims. Words and charts and assumptions with bias don't count. The real world does. Thank God for photography! And thank God for the fossils. Let me know if you want to talk about the real world instead of assumed fantasies!

Quote
They aren't. They are studied in great detail, noting all the differences as well as similarities -- including those differences that allow them to say that modern coelacanths are not the same as the fossil ones -- and then they argue about and test different relationships until they come to the best understanding possible.

Your task, should you disagree, is to provide an alternative explanation that also explains all the evidence we have. As noted, your concept of sudden Bexolution does not do that.

People who do not want to know about the rest of the world only talk to the brother that stayed in one place.


They allow themselves to make such statements based on evolutionary assumptions. You've already assumed evolution occured, just as they have, now they must fit whatever they find into that belief system. Let me know these great differences in case I missed them. I hope it's not a case of the differences you find in everything (e.g. someone with bigger ears than someone else, or a bigger nose, or anything like that). I mean make sure you prove that this creature had actually evolved and make sure it's not just another variety ok? Because the bible already describes variety and all things producing after their own kind, so let me know how Bexolution contradicts what we see and always have seen.

Quote
Your task, should you disagree, is to provide an alternative explanation that also explains all the evidence we have. As noted, your concept of sudden Bexolution does not do that.


Your task, should you be capable, is to provide the evidence in the first place.

Amusing RAZD "Bexolution"....If you can believe that all things arose out of chance, and have such faith in that....then it would actually require you less faith to believe that it is highly conceivable that they arose out of purpose, given that life itself most definitely has purpose, form and order. If you can show me how form and order comes from chance and disorder? Let me know. Until you can prove that all the things we observe today and have always been able to observe, were once a product of chance - simple celled organisms, you have failed your own test.