Quote
Quote
They give a picture of the creature, then give a drawing of how it evolved. This is dishonest. It reminds me of this guy who owned a museum and was asked why there were no fossil evidence of transitional forms, yet it was being preached anyway (with the typical charts showing the evolution process) He admitted priviately and laid it on the line, that there is not one such transitional form that one could make a water tight argument out of and actually could'nt really give any. I could find that quote and repeat it here if necessary. He admitted this privately, and unfortunately for him the letter got out and he was very very embarrassed. His evolutionary colleagues were very UNIMPRESSED with him. But the man was at least being honest when he was cornered.
They were unimpressed with him because he had very little understanding of biology but believed that he did understand it. He was poorly educated about transitional species and the recognition of such, yet he spouted off about how there are none.

That's like someone saying he's a Bible scholar but doesn't understand Paul's explanation of the mechanism of salvation (Roman road). I am sure you would say that he is deluding himself concerning his Bible knowledge.

Actually Linear, here is the quote in it's entirety, where you equate being a bible scholar with a requirement for having a full comprehensive knowledge of salvation, when in fact, in the real world, no such requirement exists. Just like no such requirement exists for truthfulness within academia concerning evolutionary theory, and as a result truthfulness is often scoffed at. Paul aka Saul was not deluding himself concerning his bible knowledge prior to having an encounter with Christ, quite the opposite by most historical accounts. He was quite well versed in Jewish scripture. And If he didn't truly believe, I doubt that Jesus would have bothered with him at all. He understood things perfectly from a Jewish perspective which simply does not include Jesus as the messiah.

People don't manage and stock well known museums all by themselves you know. If the items existed past charts and drawings and rhetoric they would be on display. kind of a no brainer there. Evolution exists purely as an illusion of charts and drawings and rhetoric. And it ain't never healed anyone of anything or even proven itself reliable as a scientific method either. It's dead I'd say.

I liked the snake with legs though. Too bad bones can't talk. Seems like most of the snakes I run into have devolved from the upwardly mobile trend there. Maybe someday people will devolve and lose their legs too huh? and somehow continue to convince themselves that that is progress...