Not taking my advice above then, I see. Really, the best thing you can do to aid your discussion here is to learn more about the things you are actually trying to discuss.

Still no evidence here either. You're waffling about Woodmorappe's use of an index fossil when it's been very clearly demonstrated to you why he was being sloppy in that respect. You seem to have ignored the dozens of other errors that Henke, the geologist, also found in Woodmorappe's work. You continue to claim that "living fossils," as rare as they are, are somehow evideence against evolution, even though the fossil record shows that the vast majority of other organisms have not only evolved but become extinct at some time in the past. You ignore the evidence I've presented for where hominid fossils have been found in the fossil record and you've ignored the three different methods I gave you for how one in particular was dated. And you also ignore the fact that the presence of varves disproves a global flood.

Pretty consistent track record for you here so far then.

As I said earlier, you have not disproved anything that Seely said. If you want to pick more bones and again demonstrate your lack of geological knowledge, feel free to go back to the relevant thread. I'd rather not be sidetracked from the growing list of questions that already remain unanswered here.