Hi RAZD, just a little addition here.

Quote
a lot of evolution can occur without visible differences, so not seeing any difference does not mean it does not happen.


Every consider that not seeing any difference may mean it didnt' happen? <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Quote
(we can discuss convergent evolution of sugar gliders and flying squirrels if you want an example).


Thanks for the link RAZD, but notice that one is already told these two creatures evolved from a common ancestors, and the flaps of skin they use to glide also "evolved" over time to adapt to their lifestyle. Where is the evidence that this occured? One wonders why human beings cannot do the same thing, and instead have to resort to creating gliders, aeroplanes etc (copying design) or diving suits and equipment so we can remain under water for an extended period. one wonders why we don't just wait for evolution to kick in, as we keep pushing the envelope until it figures out it must adapt and evolve a new structure.

See evolution brain washes the viewer into believing it's most likely occured, even in the failure of evidence to support that it did. One is really not supposed to question it.. I believe this is a big part of why people are convinced/indoctrinated. They don't question evolution, they accept it almost in blind faith and work everything around that, even if visible signs defy it occured.

E.g. (how long do you think we have been evolving) this is assuming we evolved and is a way of indoctrination. The person no longer questions "if" we evolved, but rather "how long it's been going on". They don't question and no longer think about doing so.

So it was hardly surprising to see the same thing with the sugar gliders and flying squirrels, though they are very cute and share similar qualities, which I enjoy seeing, as for me as a creationist, I see God's marvellous design/traits.

I got the answer right by the way, but I'm not fooled by the evolution push.