Quote
Why are marine invertebrate fossils supposed to be a problem for evolution?
Why would anything be a problem for those who assume any fossil is its own evidence that it evolved? So long as you interpret things the way your priests instruct you to, you should have no problems.

Quote
There are known transitional fossils for these as well, as Glenn Morton discusses here.
"Known transitional fossils"? Ha! I see no series available for any of the marine invert's - just a tiny handful of dubious individual "fill-ins" to account for the imagined evolution of a group that numbers 19 times as many fossils as all other groups combined. This group is far, far more complete and of better quality as well. There doesn't appear to be much excuse. I really don't expect you to make up this huge imbalance on your own. Give credit where credit's due: either the religion, or its hierarchy seem to be at fault.

Quote
Glenn Morton was a YEC until he found work as a geophysicist for an oil company, and daily had to confront physical evidence that the earth is old. This tends to happen to geologists. By the way, Morton is still a devouted Christian -- he found ways to reconcile this with an old earth and evolution.
Sure. There's what? A 5 or 10 % chance he wasn't a mole all along?

Quote
I'm surprised you're still trumpeting Woodmorappe's list, despite the links I've given you which show numerous errors he has made and which show that his data is unreliable (not surprising, given his track record of errors in other areas).
Confused? You have not yet demonstrated one single error. You linked to a source who said he thought some of the fossils on the list might have been reworked. You omitted to drag out Glen Morton's tired stories about Woodmorappe; is that what you're thinking about? Or maybe you recognize they're just too lame?

Settle down folks, don't everyone shout "AS IF!" at once. Just to be safe, they are lame indeed.

Quote
I suppose if I offered you that hypothetical trilobite reworked fossil, you'd demand better proof that it wasn't found in its original place, despite the very strong body of evidence for this to be the case. Yet, you'd be wondering why no one would be batting an eyelid if you were the one shouting, "An anomalous fossil! Evolution is dead!"
Hypothetical fossils aren't the issue. 236 real fossils are. I don't care how many evolutionists & their brothers think they might've been reworked. "Might have been" is hypothetical. When are you going to face up to the real-world evidence instead of trying to speculate it away.

Or do you prefer to continue making false claims that you've dealt with the evidence? Right out in broad daylight for everyone to see...

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson