Quote
Refuted by a geologist, who explains Woodmorappe's erroneous conclusions. I haven't read anything by Woodmorappe which is scientifically accurate, and I've had to look up his work a number of times now.
Disappointing after that last hothead. This guy disagrees with some things & explains why. He never talks about any of the macrofossils. And he assumes the evodates when he says
Quote
The reason why I think these are reworked is that there aren't any Tertiary marine sediments in Utah, particularly not in the Pleistocene, which was the epoch immediately before the Holocene, which is the epoch we're in now.
It's circular to assume evodates as evidence of reworking, so this isn't all that convincing.

Later, he assumes Woodmorappe's wrong about conglomorates. He offers a scenario which might account for this, but no evidence that it has taken place.

As a "refutation" in the common sense of the word, this is both tenuous and incomplete. But I expect you mean it in the evosense.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson