Quote
Nice dodge. I listed evidence for evolution and even explained what I personally think is most convincing. I chose a simple piece of the puzzle which doesn't even need a link: the fossil record. It shows sorting all around the world. The sorting is constantly tested, with every fossil that is found. Every fossil found in situ shows it. It's up to y'all to give an instance where this is not the case because it would be an extraordinary scientific discovery. Other pieces of evidence for evolution can, and have been, developed in other threads. I also asked SoSick if there was something else she'd rather focus on here, like the (lack of) evidence for a flood, but she has so far been unwilling to do so.
Is this the pattern? <img src="http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/images/fossil_dist2.gif">
Evolutionfairytale dot com has somewhat to say about the pattern, including
Quote
The distribution of fossils is illustrated in the pie chart in Figure 1. As can be seen, complex invertebrates constitute 95% of the fossil record. The remaining 5% consists mostly of plants & algae, where again we find no fossil evidence of evolution, whatsoever.3 In the small portion that includes insects, again we find no fossil evidence of evolution, whatsoever

The problems only get worse for the evolutionist. Not only is there no sign of evolution leading up to the complex invertebrates, but also missing in action are the enormous number of transitionals that must have existed to bridge the gap between invertebrates and vertebrates. The transformation from invertebrate to vertebrate would have been a major event in the earth’s evolutionary history. Yet the fossil record does not leave a single shred of evidence for this enormous transformation!
And
Quote
Numerous soft-bodied specimens from the Ediacara fauna, organisms in pre-Cambrian strata, have now been found in more than 30 localities worldwide.16 These creatures are so diverse and unusual that many evolutionists recognize that they cannot possibly be ancestors to the complex invertebrates, and consider them an evolutionary dead-end. This fauna also appears in the fossil record suddenly with no trace of ancestors whatsoever, compounding the problem for evolutionists even further.
Interesting pattern indeed, and the article points out some more. Wouldn't be right to copy the whole thing.

There may be some other patterns. According to some, there's a pattern in the stars which shows a bear cub following the momma bear. This makes plenty of sense, because we know bears always come from bears.

As for consistency, I don't think so. Seeing as this old list has 200 out-of-place fossils, and it wasn't even comprehensive in its day; there doesn't appear to be any absolute pattern. I'm aware that there has been plenty of silly propaganda, but these things are no longer difficult to investigate.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson