I think it's clear from the example I gave here, plus countless others on the internet, that Of Pandas and People was originally a creationist book that underwent some slight revisions, .e.g replacing the word "creationist" with "intelligent design." Are you now claiming that creationism has nothing to do with religion? The authors of Of Pandas and People were a fundamentalist Christian group in Texas. The vast majority of creationists in the world are fundamentalist Christians, though there is a small group of fundamentalist Muslims who believe their own version.

You also seem to be claiming above that creationism is legitimate science. Science is an empirical method of testable observations. Please suggest some empirical tests to me that would be comaptible with "creation science." How would you test for things being "designed"? Arguments from incredulity (i.e. "this organism/organ/system etc etc is too complex to have evolved, therefore it was created") are not testable hypotheses.