Quote
Sure it's possible. But it's also equally possible that "macroevolution" -- a term coined by the creationist school of thought, incidentally, and not evolutionists themselves -- is accurate.

It's a little hard to remember your claims of indifference & take them seriously, Pwcca, when you repeat such propaganda. The term was not coined by a creationist. It's an evolutionist term that fell into disuse because when one uses the terms 'microevolution' and 'macroevolution' it's too easy to see that one has always been observed and the other hasn't.

They decided to employ bait & switch strategies instead, defining 'evolution' as any change at all & then claiming this is a "proven fact", etc. Real science doesn't need deceptive sales techniques.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson