Quote
Quote
Explain how it makes a difference & salvages the Darwin/Malthus paradigm.

It doesn't salvage the Darwin/Malthus paradigm if that means that food availability is the only thing that directly causes population density limiting. Darwin may not be right in all cases but that doesn't mean he was completely wrong. {snip}
How then do you propose to salvage Darwinian natural selection? Have you something to offer in place of fierce competition?
Quote
I already agreed that the only trigger was not food, besides I said "resource shortage" not just food shortage. Am I now supposed to be slammed for a statement that I already agreed was not entirely correct?
Since when is getting clarification the same thing as slamming? I've observed that you rely heavily on obfuscation, but I didn't know you had become one with it.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson