Yes it would be nice to have a forum here dedicated to that purpose. I guess my fear is that some people would go there and make all kinds of wild and unsubstantiated claims without a shred of proof to back them up.

If a bunch of divers described what they claimed was a dinosaur attack, I'd be open to the possibility that they experienced something unusual. They might be lying, they might be telling the truth. What would add more substance to this would be if others in the area also had similar experiences -- people who have no connections with each other, whose credentials as reliable witnesses checked out. Better still would be physical evidence added to this, for example footprints on land, pictures or film, and best of all a dead body or some kind of physical evidence which would give a DNA sample.

There's quite a body of evidence for the existence of Bigfoot, though it's next to impossible to get skeptics to look at any of it because they won't listen until there's that dead body or DNA sample. Anecdotal evidence, no matter how much of it, means nothing to them. No matter what you tell them about the footprints, they dismiss them as hoaxes. The famous Patterson film was a hoax too, they say, though people have been trying to debunk it for over 40 years and have been unable to do so.

If you're interested, The Bigfoot Field researchers Organisation and Bigfoot Mystery are two of the best sites I've found. I enjoy browsing through the sighting reports on the BFRO.