|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
Why do you mention astronomers? Because Bex brought the subject up. Ahh. I failed to get that from the context. I've given no indication that I intend to buy an internally inconsistent story Please re-read what I re-stated above and tell me how it is internally inconsistent. Again? I prefer not to go around in circles just now. even if 100% of the cosmologists agree thereupon. No more than I'll buy any such claim held to be true by 100% of all Voodoo witch-doctors. The fact that you hold all scientists in such low regard is patently obvious. Actually, I hold 'most everybody "in such high regard". Not many will sell me an internally inconsistent story. Do you think I should make special exceptions? On page 2 of your link, I found that they have a conspiracy theory of their own. The redshift is such a useful distance indicator that it is a shame that science journalists conspire to leave it out of stories: they must be taught the "5 w's but no z" rule in journalism school. Off topic, but maybe of interest to some readers.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
