Quote
He was claiming that my statement about the structure of the universe, and the cosmic microwave background, had inconsistencies. I elaborated for him but he still insists it's inconsistent, though he has given no reason for why he is still claiming it, despite the fact that astronomers have no problem with it. I cannot see how this equates to character defamation.

During the part of the story when the universe is required to be homogenous, it is. During the part of the story when it can't be, it isn't.

I see that as an internal inconsistency. I do not expect many cosmologists who promote this story to recant on account of it.

Why do you mention astronomers? What would they know? Cosmology's another field, isn't it? Even so, I've given no indication that I intend to buy an internally inconsistent story even if 100% of the cosmologists agree thereupon. No more than I'll buy any such claim held to be true by 100% of all Voodoo witch-doctors.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson