Sometimes I can hardly bare to read their reviews/comments sosick. There is this pretty embarrassing interview done with Richard Dawkins where he was unable to answer a direct question regarding evolution and he sat there and eventually he asked them to stop recording. He simply couldn't give an answer. Then when he composed himself, they started again when he was ready, yet he never answered the original question. Instead he branched off into the typical high-sounding woffle. This is on video and of course has now been posted on youtube.

Well, now it seems someone is trying to claim it as being a hoax. Can you believe this? If it were a hoax, the people responsible would certainly be liable for action by Dawkins, it's on video with all the names of those interviewed and those involved. In fact, they were kind to the guy, they shortened the time he took to "not answer" and cut out the bit where he asked that they stop taping and made it look less "embarrassing" for him. Though the youtube one shows a bit more than the video. The actual video was edited a bit.

I've seen the video, viewed all those involved and it was most definitely the real deal. He was faced with a direct question to do with evolution and he simply couldn't give an answer. And even when given time and another chance, he still never answered it and just veered off into the same complex sounding woffle, but giving no answer in the process. Tried to get himself off the hook.

I'm sure you've seen the one where they interviewed quite a few of them and showed them making these bold statements for all this evidence for evolution and then later showed them contradicting their previous statements when asked to give evidence/examples. Suddenly when faced with having to give answers, they climbed right down and previous statements of the enormous amount of evidence in the fossil record, were transformed into lots of back-peddling woffle and giving all kinds of excuses.

y/w for the link CTD, I thought you'd like that one! hehe.