if you have need to disprove it, provide your own non-causal links. Trying to make work for me? Do some yourself.
Fact: A happened, then B happened.
Assumption: A caused B.
Let's think of some other things that have been going on in the world in the past century or so. Quantum physics was a pretty big discovery.
Quantum physics was discovered. The world is degenerate (in your opinion). This was caused by quantum physics.
Radio, then television, were invented. The world is degenerate. This was caused by radio and television.
The equal rights movement occurred. The world is degenerate. This was caused by the equal rights movement.
All of these assertions are as baseless as yours. Presumably you don't need me to point out the logical errors here.
Well, considering that most of darwins' theory of evolution' is not scientific that would be very difficult.
science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific method, as well as to the organized body of knowledge gained through such research.
The scientific method, at its most basic, involves looking at the available evidence without preconceived notions -- in other words, with an open mind. You formulate a hypothesis to explain the evidence. You test the hypothesis. The more tests you do with positive results, the more likely it is that your hypothesis is correct. If other scientists can replicate your results, then the truth of your hypothesis is likelier still. After many successful tests, which may include measuring the hypothesis up against new evidence, the hypothesis becomes a theory.
Darwin formulated the ToE to explain the available evidence such as the sorting of the fossil record, and variation. It has been tested successfully for almost 150 years.
Scientific evidence for common descentGenetics, a brand-new scientific field unknown in Darwin's time, has verified evolution.
Now, would you like to explain how creationism meets these scientific standards?
Most current 'science' does not agree with darwin's ideas
This is untrue. The vast majority of scientists accept evolution as fact. This is because they can see that it explains the evidence better than anything else.
there are no real scientific studies based on them in that respect
Click on the link above and you will find a few dozen.
The Nazis tried, but look where that got us.
They tried what? Evolution does not condone or validate eugenics, racism, sexism, or any of these things -- see my A-is-presumed-to-cause-B example above, and also what LinearAQ and I have said about people who co-opt any theory in order to justify their behaviour.
Hitler quoted the Bible too. He believed in God. Do you think that means we should all see the Bible and God as evil because they were supported by Hitler?
Darwins ideas fail a scientific method, they've never been proven.
See above.
Don't take your lessons here from CTD. If you make an assertion you need to back it up with some evidence.
