Quote
Considering the number of scientists extant in the timeframe being discussed, it shouldn't be hard to find cases of legitimate creationists being convinced by the "overwhelming" evidence. But nobody's producing evidence to support this version of history. I honestly am not stumbling across them in my own research.

And yet it happened, because evolution is now accepted by the vast majority of the scientific community. And this is because it explains the evidence so well, not because they are haunted by the ghosts of the X-Club.

Quote
Neither am I failing to support my discoveries. I've included many links with my reports, more than I honestly expect people want to read.

These seems to be a misunderstanding of "evidence" here. You've given links to information about people and groups. None of this proves that there was a conspiracy amongst heathen scientists to subvert the true believers in creationism for their own diabolical ends. You've made it up.

Quote
for they've had a good amount of time and still haven't produced any evidence.

You only think this because you have deliberately ignored what LinearAQ and I have been presenting to you. I've linked to this in another thread but it's such an informative read, and pertinent to your comment as well, that I will link to it here:

29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent

Quote
Would anyone care to count the links I've provided in support vs. the links provided by evolutionists in support of their claims?

No, because you have not proved here that evolution is a giant conspiracy, and you have offered very little evidence for any of your claims on other threads.