|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,153
Master Elite Member
|
I took what you said to mean that my point of view deserved some sort of smoting by God or that I would/deserved to be put in a cage. Obviously, I think anyone could see that by now.. I did not say behavior is regulated, at least that was not my intent. Could you point out what I stated that gave you this idea? You did say it, more than once. but your most glaring example... How would you try to do that? I know! We would not consider rabbits to be particularly intelligent, would we? Now, when 2 rabbits mate, the result is typically between 5 and 9 small objects with regulated moving parts. Voila! I have provided evidence that falsifies your hypothesis. whew! That took some work! ... ..and the rest in defense of that glaring example. It's pretty obvious you see the item of rabbits mating and producing more hopping little bunny rabbits, and everything involved in between in that process as an example of what you would define as regulated moving parts. and if for some reason howsoever you did not intend to imply the same idea for humans, then i excuse your error though there doesn't seem to be much room for it. and likewise i will not point the error out to you again because you have made it quite redundantly clear that your opinions are above reproach and your insights should never be questioned. Regardless of the substance. You may believe that the teaching of evolution is atheistic and the cause of the moral decay that you see around you, but that doesn't make those assessments true. oh no, never. you are always correct. You can provide your own rebuttal to your rebuttal after this too. Have fun with yourself and your own ideas. Regardless of the substance.
|
|
|
|
|
