For goodness' sake, explain what you are on about. Or this thread will die due to lack of sense.

Russ claimed in another thread that he thought the eye is irreducibly complex, which is a creationist idea that has been around a while. I showed him different steps in the evolution of the eye which begin with the simplest form, an eye spot that can detect light and dark. What's more, all of these evolutionary steps are still evident and can be studied in different organisms today.

Are you claiming that the mechanism for movement is irreducibly complex?