Quote
I'm going to give up on this thread unless you explicitly state what you're trying to get at here. I'm not inclined to play 20 questions.

Why do you think that the fact that organisms can move their bodies is evidence for ID?

What I'm getting at: it's nonsense to claim ID isn't science because there's no testable hypothesis. I thought that one up while I was drifting off to sleep or just waking up - I forget which. Anyhow, it's not difficult to come up with one, and I don't claim to be the first. This may have been lurking in my memory for some time, so I can't even claim it's original.

I do maintain it's a valid hypothesis, and it supports ID. Big whoop. This thread should die quickly, and the issue should be settled. I don't expect evolutionists to give up their slander; slogans die hard.

Being as I'm not perfect, there's also a chance I'm mistaken here. Posting this hypothesis gives others a chance to review it and offer criticism. I welcome any valid criticism, as well as any suggestions for improvement.

In the meantime, countless tests of this hypothesis are under way!

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson