I was somewhat pleased to find that I'm not alone in spotting the nearly universal tendency of evolutionists' arguments to be circular. At
http://tccsa.tc/archives/thomas_remine/round1b.html
Walter ReMine uses a chart to demonstrate this in a debate. His arrangement is different, and he's working more with the modern theories. (see - I remembered to abuse the term!)

I was also impressed by
Quote
Table-2: Message Theory

Life was reasonably designed:

1. for survival,
2. to look like the product of one designer (not multiple-independent designers), and
3. to resist all other explanations (including Darwin’s, Lamarck’s, Gould’s, Syvanen’s, Hoyle’s, and yours).
I hadn't seen this before. It looks promising.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson