Food for thought:

If CTD were attacking the validity of the Bible and pulling the same crap that he is in this thread, would you say his arguments were valid?

He claims that the use of certain evidence in support of evolution is invalid because it has been used by Darwin. Then he claims that it is circular reasoning even though his explanation for this does not match the definition of circular reasoning that HE provided. When asked to show how using these evidences are circular, CTD just says "I showed you that circular reasoning is invalid, what are you stupid or something?"

As long as he supports creationism in this manner, he does a disservice to all creationists. Additionally, his insulting behavior leads me to believe that he is not a Christian at all and is purposefully trying to undermine the good name of Christianity.