I think it's about time you explained what you mean somewhere, about genetics falsifying evolution.

As I have said, evolution is testable and falsifiable. Genetics could never be evidence on which the ToE was based, but when it emerged as a branch of science it was new evidence which put the ToE to the test. Genetic relationships we find among animals have lended strong support for common descent. How can the ToE be circular reasoning if we can test it with new evidence?

You can pursue this line as long as you want but the logic doesn't check out.

By the way, telling me you won't be "sidetracked" seems a handy way of avoiding questions to me.

I'm trying to cut to the chase. You're arguing semantics here. Look at everything in all of your boxes. It all fits with the ToE. For the upteenth time, please explain your alternative model which covers all the evidence and is testable and falsifiable..