|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
So we should just overlook a fundamental flaw, and go quibble about something else? I fail to see this fundamental flaw of which you speak. I know you do. I've provided links, but to no avail. Can someone please explain circular reasoning to LindaLou? I'm out of ammo. If you think the ToE is not a satisfactory explanation for any of the criteria that you listed in your OP, then which ones does it not explain, and what would be your alternative model? Falsifying one theory does not by default validate another one. You don't get creationism validated if you manage somehow to poke holes in the ToE. I will not be sidetracked. You also seem to think that the ToE cannot be tested. Yet this is what happens all the time. If any fossil were found "out of sequence" in situ and no one could find any explanation for it, then we'd have a major discovery on our hands. Likewise, genetics could have blown the whole thing out of the water but it didn't. I really am interested in why you say you think the opposite. I will not be sidetracked. Is creationism in any way falsifiable or testable? I will not be sidetracked. Guess I know what to put on my hotkey!
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
