Quote
Let's look at this from another angle. Let's say that hypothetically you were right and evolutionary science was begging the question. This would mean that if evolution were a false premise to begin with, it should be easy to spot where the scientists have manipulated, ignored, or lied about the facts in order to shoe-horn them into their theory. (We'll ignore, for now, the conspiracy-of-scientists idea which would also be involved here.) Why don't we talk about some of your ideas on this?

So we should just overlook a fundamental flaw, and go quibble about something else? Did you notice the title of the thread? Thanks for the laugh.

It looks like you need to review. There are 3 link-words to three explanations up there. Maybe one of them will stick. When one employs circular reasoning, no further errors are needed - one automatically obtains the desired result.

The rest of you post should be discussed elsewhere. We already know who first named the animals: Adam.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson