|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,178
Master Elite Member
|
Hi sergio,
I'm not sure I'd so quickly opt for extraction, unless you have a root canal there or there is more amalgam than tooth...
If that is the case? and you want to get some removed for that reason? Then make sure you get a biologic dentist to do this and request a NON vaso constrictor, (non epinephrine) local anaesthetic. The reason being. Vaso constrictors restrict blood flow to the area and are apparently a cause or contributing factor to the development of cavitations (which is when health bone growth fails to fill in the area after the tooth has been removed).
They are used in anaesthetics to apparently increase the effectiveness and prolong the numbing. I, personally have not found this to be the case and instead found them worse, plus they cause adverse responses in me (palpitations) and of course decrease necessary blood flow to the area and contribute to dead teeth. So yes, I bleieve they hinder healing after tooth extraction.
Also, ask that the peridontal ligament be removed as well as the tooth. Many dentists leave the periodontal ligament there, and they should remove it. It is also a cause or contributing factor in cavitations.
The problem with cavitations is that where there is a lack of healthy bone growth, potent gram negative bacteria flourish and if a person's immunity is compromised in anyway, then the immune system may not be able to defend itself and keep the bacteria in check. It may then become systemic and cause it's own toxicity, often worse apparently than mercury.
Then you have to make sure you take care of the extraction site so that infection does not develop there. All these things should be observed if you want to reduce the risk for cavitations after tooth extraction. Tooth extraction commonly causes cavitations, but it's usually the immune compromised who seem to get affected more.
So with that in mind, it's up to you if you wish to do that. I always feel it's wise to warn people in case. better to be a bit overcautious than not.
|
|
|
|
|