I think………….

I think its because of the way they do the tests and how they judge the test results.

Lets say they test 1000 people. They plot all 1000 test results on a graph and you get a bell curve…..like this…..

http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgu...p;resnum=1&ct=image&cd=2

They then take a certain percentage…lets say 90 pct…and call that normal. All people within the 90pct are classed as normal. That’s from the mid point of the graph, the highest point, 45pct in each direction.
The rest is abnormal. So abnormal is 5pct on each side of the bell curve at the outer limits of the curve. (where is says “definitely more than others” on that link)

All those 90pct “normals” are very varied…look at the scope of difference that normal can be away from the mid point. The mid point is “Optimal health” or best health.

If you are in the 5pct zone and the end…only the most horrendous results will be there. Only the most sick people will be here.

Which is why the test result comes out as fine. Its because of the way western medicine judges the tests. You have to be seriously ill to fall into the 5pct ill part, by which time it’s a bit late. If your test result comes in at 44pct away from the mid point, you are only 1 pct away from being classed as “out of range”, but you are clearly more sick that healthy….but to western medicine, because of they way they judge the results….you are “in range” and “fine” even if you are only 1pct away from “out of range” !!

Unless your test result is at the top of the bell curve, you are not in optimal health and you are sick….just western medicine only takes the sickest people to be sick…..something to do with insurance me thinks!

Not sure if that is clear? It is to me, vaguely.

I have read about this, but I can’t remember where, nor can I find it googling it….so this will have to do. ask more questions if you want and I will try and answer.

All my test results from my regular doctor where “in-range” – my doctor sent me home to….. I quote….”enjoy my good health.”