From a legal standpoint, it seems most logical that the dentists are responsible. They would be the ones you sue.

Now dentists, on the other hand, would sue their "licensing authority", which would be the ADA for supplying them with misinformation thereby "putting them in legal jeopardy". In fact, the ADA prohibited them from speaking to patients about the dangers of mercury based on their so-called ethics guidelines and used it as a bases for revoking dentist's licenses.

In fact, I believe there is a good case here for a huge criminal prosecution because based on my information, the ADA knowingly lied about the dangers of mercury. They will claim they knew nothing about the dangers of mercury which raises the question, "Why did you state that it was safe then?".

They will reply, "Because we thought it was.".

The next logical question is, "Why did you think it was?".

Their answer, "Because we had studies that said so.".

Question: "What studies?".

Answer... Now they will come up with some study somewhere that could be construed to imply that mercury was safe even though there are a myriad of studies saying it is not. Nevertheless, this would be their legal maneuvering.

The irony here is this. If an herbalists says that some herb will "prevent", "treat", or "cure" some disease, they will be prosecuted for practicing medicine without a license because the herb is being sold as a drug and you cannot distribute drugs without a license. This diabolical twist of logic has been (and is currently being) used to justify the invasion and closure of numerous herbs stores across this country which (not suprisingly) receives virtually no press. However, this same logic could be used to prosecute the ADA because they are making false claims about the safety of a substance that is well known to be harmful, yet is being used in a medical procedure. Ignorance?which is what they will claim?should not be an excuse for those considered experts in the field. Nevertheless, they will argue that amalgam fillings have never been claimed to be a cure for cavaties. The prosecutor should argue that the ADA does state that amalgams are a "treatment" for cavities, which makes it a drug which makes them practicing medicine. In other words, use the system's same twisted logic against those who use it for tyranny.

The sad part of this story is that the ADA officials will never (not in this life) get the punishment they deserve for the massive damage, disease and death they have caused. Families have been torn apart. People have died as a result; Some directly, others indirectly. Children have been made sick or lived their lives with horrible birth defects; and on and on. The drug companies have made trillions of dollars "treating" the side effects of mercury poisoning in the form of:

diabetes
allergies
autoimmune diseases
parkinsone's
alzheimers'
ADD/ADHD
depression
cancer
weight-related issues
OCD
arthritis
lupus
MCS
chronic fatigue
fibromyalgia
IBS
crohn's
yeast/candida
and countless more

This is?in fact?one of the greatest evils ever purportrated on mankind by mankind.

Americans should be furious.