I'd love to see you sue the ADA too. The problem is that their position is that they are not responsible for your issues related to fillings because they didn't install or manufacture them. Unfortunately, I believe the courts will, at least for the mean time, support their position.

Here's a quote.

"The American Dental Association (ADA) owes no legal duty of care to protect the public from allegedly dangerous products used by dentists. The ADA did not manufacture, design, supply or install the mercury-containing amalgams. The ADA does not control those who do. The ADA's only alleged involvement in the product was to provide information regarding its use. Dissemination of information relating to the practice of dentistry does not create a duty of care to protect the public from potential injury."

The Superior Court of the State of California
Case No. 718228, Demurrer (October 22, 1992)

Please let us know if make any progress or decide to proceed down this road. I'm very interested in the legal implications because it will have a widespread affect on countless suffering souls.

Many thanks!