Just curious, which is more thorough:

Irridology or the QXCI?

Because I had been hooked up to the QXCI & found it to be quite on target as far as diagnostics. Of course, for interpretation of some of its cryptic terminology, one has to depend on a practitioner, which can be problematic. (Same goes for irridology). I've found that whenever one has to depend on humans, they have their moods, they can decide not to be thorough (which always happens to me), they can be inaccurate, & despite all this, they charge a mint to boot...

They lack conscience. I've been the gauntlet, so believe me, I know.