|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
so yeah anonymous, I see where you are coming from. The fact someone doesn't show symptoms of direct toxicity from mercury, what about the indirect signs? Like the illnesses that come later on that are not attributed to the direct toxicity of mercury.
I've seen people with a mouth full of amalgams leading apparently normal healthy lives, but surely if this stuff is universally a neurotoxin and not fit for human consumption, then it has to be toxic to all living things, regardless of symptoms of poisoning or intolerance.
And some are able to elminate it easier before it can build up and cause too many symptoms, plus if they're not hypersensitive, they are unlikely to notice many effects until they develop an illness that might seem unrelated to mercury, but may very well be caused by it.
|
|
|
|
|