it was a rhetorical question RAZD. didn't really require an answer since you've already given your answer.

Just thought it would be interesting to throw the ball back into your court to see if you liked how it felt. but apparently you aren't making the connection. If you were given the message that castration were an acceptable behavior, an appropriate form of birth conrol since age 7, chances are excellent you would accept it and perhaps even engage in it. and the fact is, no one has ever died of castration done properly.. whereas women do die from abortions even when performed 'properly'. Therefore, castration is a safer form of birth control. you should easily understand that logic since you use it daily yourself.

Is there any particular reason you seem to feel that my opinion should always represent christian morality as you seem to perceive it? maybe your perceptions are a bit askew, ever considered that? I've never met a non-christian who comprehended christianity morality past the idea that all christians should love everyone and give everyone else their time and stuff for free... which isn' true anyway except to non-christians who believe that for some odd reason... but are you saying you are the first non-christian who can perfectly define christianity? i didn't see you link to a wikipedia definition...Do you want to tell me about the life of Jesus too? And how i should imitate it?

I thought this discussion was about abortion not empty pregnancy sacs anway. who cares about empty pregnancy 'sacs'. they don't do anything, they don't grow, they don't show up on ultrasound as babies, they don't get a mulit-week age date by an ob-gyn. i suppose you think an ob-gyn would miss that prior to doing abortion, that is the jist of your argument... it's useless really... your entire argument is irrelevant. it's an empty argument. Ob-gyns don't perform abortions on every woman that's comes running in claiming to be pregnant you know.

I don't know whether to just say duh or duh.