Yer a real hoot, SoSick.

Quote
Well, I think at the point that you start discussing preventing death or injury to the mother you have moved far beyond trying to guess the status of true conception, fetus or not, so why would you use that as as retort in this case?
You were the one that asked if all abortions were unnecessary due the the possibility that the zygote/embryo/fetus may not be viable anyway. The answer is that some are necessary, and that without one in some cases both woman and zygote/embryo/fetus will perish. The choice then is whether to save the life of the known living breathing human being or to hold out for a possible maybe might become one. The ethical answer is that the family concerned decides -- not you -- and they should have the right to base that decision on honest information and not emotional clap-trap.

Quote
Also since abortion, sucking the fetus out from the woman's womb one way or another, can also cause health problems, even death for the mother, wouldn't it be simpler for men like you who would suggest that's it's fine for a woman abort a fetus to simply make a small incision in their own body, say in their scrotum, and suck out their testicles instead? Then we wouldn't have to bother with the discussion of life and death issues at all.
This is hysterical coming from you, when I think the woman should have the right to decide, a right that you want to take away.

You would choose the "rights" of an empty pregnancy sac over the life of a woman. That's rational. That's respectful of other people.

Is this another example of "christian morality" that you keep coming up with?

Enjoy.
[color:"green"]
Note: my time is limited, so I only choose threads of particular interest to me and I cannot guarantee a reply to all responses (particularly if they do not discuss the issue/s), and I expect other people to do the same. Thank you for your consideration.[/color]