You've mentioned it twice now Bex,

Quote
It's not a good idea, especially after Haeckel's scandalous artistic embryo frauds.....
Here's an image you can compare with Haeckel's drawings btw. Did you know that Haeckel was not the only embryologist of his time, and he was largely criticized from the start? His theory is false, his drawings may be inaccurate, but the facts of embryological development remain. The consensus among biologists is that the drawings are still useful, however now we can use pictures instead to show the same thing.


Enjoy.
[color:"green"]
Note: my time is limited, so I only choose threads of particular interest to me and I cannot guarantee a reply to all responses (particularly if they do not discuss the issue/s), and I expect other people to do the same. Thank you for your consideration.[/color]