I don't understand your attitude, SoSick. You claim that evolution is unscientific. You claim that creationism explains the evidence much better. Yet you refuse point blank to discuss anything about it. I have no intention of making fun of anything. Why should I even question it, if what you present here is scientifically accurate and plausible? You're not afraid that it isn't, are you?

I really think that in all fairness, if we've got so many different threads where evolution is being criticised, that we at least discuss creationism. Yes? What would make it the default theory to turn to if evolution were somehow disproved? Sorry but "the Bible says so" isn't enough to hold up a theory.

I'll leave the question open to you. Pick one thing about creationism that you think explains the evidence. Something that validates it as a genuine theory, one that should be taught in schools. If you continue to refuse then we'll have to accept that you are simply incapable of doing so, which will further erode the credibility of your position here.