I'm not upset at all Russ, just bemused that you seem to have missed points that have been made to you over and over.

Abiogenesis, as has been explained (see RAZD's thread), is not part of the theory of evolution. Have you read what he has written there about that topic? I learned a lot myself from reading it. I haven't seen any comments there from you.

Evolution doesn't "believe" anything. Evolution IS. Life changes over time.


You've provided me with some good laughs today. I thank you for that. Please give me some clear evidence that this is logically so. Show me how evolution causes the evils of the world. Show me that it, above all other possibilities, is the evil culprit. Tell me how the fact that life changes over time is responsible for . . . what did you say . . . Satanism?

You also seem to be making the assumption that RAZD thinks like Dawkins does. Dawkins is an evangelical atheist. RAZD is not an atheist. He's made that point several times. Evolution does not equate with atheism. Evolution is the change in life over time. Plenty of evolutionists are theists.


Presumably this is your tactic in endlessly repeating "evolutionists think rocks turn into men" even though it has been explained in detail to you many times that this is not what the theory of evolution says at all.


Let's get back to talking about concrete, detailed science then. Show me how any creationist tenet -- pick any one you like -- is founded on science and logic. I asked SoSick to get back down to details but she doesn't seem to be interested in doing anything other than tossing out the usual insults. Would you like to talk about abiogenesis on the designated thread, or start a new one about something specific, like the fossil record? Of course you'd need to keep it unlocked so we can debate.