RAZD seems to think of himself as a dictionary of some sort. He has a love for scientific words, like your love for long words, big words. You both seem to think that is somehow impressive. Wow how impressive. So both of you try to use these methods to present these very haughty intricate arguments, that actually, say nothing, prove nothing. Despite all the big words, the arguments are quite shallow and generally meaningless. What's quite telling is your actual lack of knowledge, both of you, of the world around you and how things actually work. You've both got a hundred reasons for why evolution is this or that and a hundred different excuses for the most simple things occurring on a daily basis which obviously prove your theories wrong. Theories... very boring dumb theories and conjectures. They're not making the best seller list I guess. Demanding a response that suits you is hardly the way to make your point gain respectability. Especially considering the nonsense of the arguments so much of the time. What's most telling really is the way you completely ignore anything that proves you wrong, even concrete evidence and call it or anything or anyone that proves you wrong, a lie or a liar.

Reading Dr Suess is more fun, even more educational. I like the pictures too. Somewhere in the land of wanna be it was thought to be or believed to be or theorized or somehow maybe perhaps proposed...

It's very interesting though, the many different insane and illogical ways you go about your arguments. That, more than anything, teaches me pretty much everything i need to know about evolution.