Anyone might think that by posting a creationist claim and locking the thread, the poster is afraid of being confronted with scientific evidence to the contrary. But that can't be, because the creationists here are in no way insecure about their beliefs are they?
It's sad that you assume the worst of my character. Those who know me would never do such things.
It is not fear that motivates me to lock the threads (as you suggested), it is love.
I desire to keep the information on this system as organized as possible so people have the ability to hear both side of an argument (which they are currently not receiving in the school system or the museum system—a socialists agenda). Allowing responses to the "sticky" posts at the top of this forum only corrupts the order of the posts making it difficult to display pertinent information in an orderly way.
It has nothing to do with fear. It is my love of the truth and my heartfelt concern for those who visit this forum to have the opportunity to hear logic and reason uncorrupted by a false faith that teaches that rocks turn into highly complex, intelligent, symmetrical, self-reproducing machines over time.
[color:"darkblue"]
"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless."[/color]
—Bounoure, Le Monde Et La Vie (October 1963) [Director of Research at the National center of Scientific Research in France].
Funny, that's just what I was thinking. I notice Russ has ceased to engage with any of RAZD's posts and is simply producing loads of creationist propaganda to which he will allow no one to reply.
Linda,
You have the entire forum to post your replies to. Is that not sufficient for you?
I could suppose that you—as an unapologetic socialist (as you called yourself on another thread)—are unhappy that you cannot post replies in some certain way, that is, just the way you want? In this case, do you feel that your "rights" are being withheld? If so, this is another great irony and contradiction within you (with all due respect).
You see, unlike evolutionists, I do not believe that rocks turn into highly complex, intelligent, symmetrical, self-reproducing machines over time, and for this reason, I believe in inalienable rights and I enjoy exercising them.
You see, your faith in socialism is a fantastically naive faith (just as is your faith in evolution) that has numerous internal contradictions and self-serving purposes. Socialism is the system created by the worlds worst tyrants and is currently promoted by those who also currently enslave you.
I kindly highly suggest you read the federalists papers and also check out some of the links below. These will help you understand that what the Bible has said is correct in that these end times will bring about a cruel socialist world government who will kill a majority of the world's population (have you read UN Agenda 21?).
My hope for you Linda is that you will take some time to explore those who have views that oppose your own, for you can only find your own internal contradictions by testing them against logic and reason, and current logic dictates that rocks do not turn into highly complex, intelligent, symmetrical, self-reproducing machines over time. It is simply not logical and there is simply no evidence for it, only the appearance of evidence that—when more deeply explored—turns out to be false and deceitful.
I would also share with you the fact that socialism is, among other things, a system that allows the funneling of private money into the hands of big (politically-influential) business. Again, you need to carefully understand history to see what the origin of these things really are.
[color:"brown"]Please take time to explore the opposing viewpoints as it may expand your own if you have the proper humility (no small requirement).[/color]
All the best.
Evolution Disproved in 50 ArgumentsEvolution\'s Moral Implications (video)Creation vs. Evolution VideoThese (below) will help reveal part of the Biblically-predicted end-time conspiracies...
Detailed Instructions for Sabotaging Voting MachinesVote Fraud or Mistake in New Hampshire ConfirmedClinton Curtis (Computer Programmer) Rigs Voting MachinesVoting Machine Sabotage Demonstrated on Video---
The abuses enumerated in this document were executed by socialists who purposed to control the world, which can only be achieved by gaining the support of those who are naive to history.
The Declaration of IndependenceReturn of the Nephilim, Chuck MisslerThe New Order of BarbariansThe Government Always Tells the TruthConfessions of An Ex-RX Drug PusherBiological Warfare: Experiments On the American PeopleFrom Freedom To FascismOur Solor SystemOne Nation Under SiegeThe Bar Code and the Mark of the BeastLoose ChangeBush Nazi Family TiesKennedy On Secret Societies...for by your medication were all the nations deceived.The Lincoln Assassination and the Jesuit Connection, Jon Eric Phelps (MP3)The Sons of God and Biblical Prophecy, Michael HeiserJunk Science: Global Warming Myth BustedNew Age Bible Versions"I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning, consequently assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption . . The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics; he is also concerned to prove there is no valid reason why he personally should not [color:"red"]
do as he wants to do[/color] . . For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. [color:"red"]
We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom[/color]."
—Aldous Huxley, "Confessions of a Professed Atheist," Report: Perspective on the News, Vol. 3, June 1966, p. 19 [grandson of evolutionist Thomas Huxley, Darwin's closest friend and promoter, and brother of evolutionist Julian Huxley. Aldous Huxley was one of the most influential liberal writers of the 20th century]. (emphasis mine)
[color:"red"]
"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law."[/color]
—Aleister Crowley, Satanist, The Book of the Law, 1:40
(This statement is taken from the first chapter verse 40 of the The Book of the Law, also know as Liber al vel Legis, which is claimed to have been communicated to Aleister Crowley by a discarnate entity known as Aiwass on April 8, 9 and 10 in 1904, in Cairo, Egypt.) (emphasis mine)
—I include this here to demonstrate the true reason for the incessant promotion of the myth of evolution, namely, the desire for sexual freedom via the elimination of God from our minds: see following...
[color:"brown"]
"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind..."[/color]
—Romans 1:28
"As by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed. Why do we not find them embedded in the crust of the earth? Why is not all nature in confusion [of halfway species] instead of being, as we see them, well-defined species?"
—Charles Darwin, quoted in H. Enoch, Evolution or Creation (1966), p. 139.
"The theory of evolution suffers from grave defects, which are more and more apparent as time advances. It can no longer square with practical scientific knowledge."
—Albert Fleishmann, Zoologist
"The irony is devastating. The main purpose of Darwinism was to drive every last trace of an incredible God from biology. But the theory replaces God with an even more incredible deity—omnipotent chance."
—T. Rosazak, Unfinished Animal (1975), pp. 101-102.
"Unfortunately, in the field of evolution most explanations are not good. As a matter of fact, they hardly qualify as explanations at all; they are suggestions, hunches, pipe dreams, hardly worthy of being called hypotheses."
—Norman Macbeth, Darwin Retried (1971), p. 147.
"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact.' A tangled mishmash of guessing games and figure juggling [Tahmisian called it]."
—The Fresno Bee, August 20, 1959, p. 1-B [quoting T.N. Tahmisian, physiologist for the Atomic Energy Commission].
"The theory [of evolution] is a scientific mistake.' "
—Louis Agassiz, quoted in H. Enoch, Evolution or Creation, (1966), p. 139. [Agassiz was a Harvard University professor and the pioneer in glaciation.]
"It has been estimated that no fewer than 800 phrases in the subjunctive mood (such as `Let us assume,' or `We may well suppose,' etc.) are to be found between the covers of Darwin's Origin of Species alone."
—L. Merson Davies [British scientist], Modern Science (1953), p. 7.
"Present-day ultra-Darwinism, which is so sure of itself, impresses incompletely informed biologists, misleads them, and inspires fallacious interpretations . .
"Through use and abuse of hidden postulates, of bold, often ill-founded extrapolations, a pseudoscience has been created. It is taking root in the very heart of biology and is leading astray many biochemists and biologists, who sincerely believe that the accuracy of fundamental concepts has been demonstrated, which is not the case."
—Pierre P. de Grasse, The Evolution of Living Organisms (1977), p. 202.
"The over-riding supremacy of the myth [of evolution] has created a widespread illusion that the theory of evolution was all but proved one hundred years ago and that all subsequent biological research—paleontological, zoological and in the newer branches of genetics and molecular biology—has provided ever-increasing evidence for Darwinian ideas. Nothing could be further from the truth.
—Charles Darwin, quoted in *N.C. Gillespie, Charles Darwin and the Problem of Creation (1979), p. 2 [University of Chicago book].
"I am quite conscious that my speculations run quite beyond the bounds of true science."
—Charles Darwin: In a letter to Asa Gray, a Harvard professor of biology
