People on the Marshall protocol use anti-biotics + D-vitamin lowering drug called Benicar, in a frequent dose style manner in phase 1. This bears much resemblance to the FDC of the Cutler protocol.
The style of use may resemble the protocol, but that's as far as the resemblence gets. They are treating two different problems. Obviously effective in their own way.
It is quite clear that it is pathogens that are responsible for the chronic illnesses (because anti-biotics are used) and not mercury like Andy Cutler claims.
How can you make such a bold statement in the light of many professionals around the world who have studied mercury and its effects, plus treatment/chelation and witnessed the results of their own patients (testing and otherwise), plus the experiences of many on these forums?. I believe your statement is WRONG. Mercury is responsible for a vast number of symptoms that coincidentally imitate many of the "modern day diseases". This is verified by many highy qualified physicians around the world. Pathogens too!
I've spotted Andy on an MS forum, saying that MS (Multiple Sclerosis) is caused by mercury, and people there got angry about such a statement, because some of them removed their fillings but didn't get cured, not even though many years passed after their removal.
Here is the quote from Andy:
Andy Cutler wrote:
The cause of MS is already well known - mercury from dental amalgam and vaccines. Of course doctors don't like to study how they CAUSE disease so there are few papers on this - but see Huggins and Levy in Alternative Medicine Review, online, for conclusive proof.
MS sufferers who want to let bad doctors keep hurting them can wait decades for a drug that might help a little. MS sufferers who want to get well already have the tools to do this - mercury detox - which you can find discussed at
www.noamalgam.com or on listservers such as the "frequent dose chelation" group on yahoo.com.
It is shockingly unethical for reporters to write stories about this kind of drivel and ignore seminal papers like those by Huggins and Levy, helping perpetuate the myth that MS is incurable and has no known cause.
Do you think him and huggins, seeing as they've studied mercury for many years may actually have a "point"?
Did these MS victims on that forum you spoke of thoroughly and safely remove their amalgams AND then follow a proper chelation protocol for years following? e.g. the cutler protocol? Do they speak for everybody?
Apparently they don't:
DAMS case studies - MS
http://www.whale.to/d/ms1.htmlJanie's story -
http://www.mercurypoisoned.com/janie's_story.htmlhttp://zap.intergate.ca/speech.htmlSome also do not have any mercury fillings, but yet do have chronic illnesses like MS
.
So the fact that "some" didn't have any amalgam fillings, but had chronic illnesses somehow cancels out mercury's effect on others right? And you must be aware of other exposures to mercury other than amalgams? E.g. vaccines, coal burning plants, seafood, paint, tattoos and don't forget the felt hats that contained mercury, which gave the name "mad hatters" due to the mercury effects it had on those exposed to it. One guy on a forum I am on had no amalgams and was previously very healthy, until he was severely poisoned by mercury in his job (fire fighter) from house paint. He's spent years chelating it back out and is recovering slowly. There are other toxins and issues that could cause MS symptoms or "MS" itself I'm sure. Mercury being only one possible cause or contributing factor.
I am finding your ongoing attempts to cancel out or at least "play down" mercury's role and accummulative effects somewhat suspicious on a forum such as this, especially in light of plenty of other highly qualified professionals who deal in mercury poisoning and treatment and the victims of it.
Why would you follow Andy's protocol and chelating agents, when you discount so much of what he says in regards to mercury? With only having "one" amalgam (please excuse and correct me if I am wrong in that) you may not be such a great textbook case to work from in respect to mercury and its accummulative effects. Though I have heard some people can be profoundly affected by just "one" amalgam. Hal Huggins speaks of a case with a young teenager whose one small pit amalgam stood in the way of him and a promising life. Removed the amalgam, he came right. It can happen. however, it sounds to me too like he may not have had the backlog of storage that many others have to deal with. You too may not have this problem either. It really does depend on overall exposure, your body's own threshold and length of time you were exposed to the stuff, before you can confidentally claim that it's not really mercury, but all pathogens.
