Sosick, I did go to specialists. All well known in my country and had to travel to see two of them.

I just had too many side effects and had to opt out of the protocols being given t me. Apart from one who was good and gave me homeopathy. But I could not continue to afford traveling to see him and was not able to simply get by with requesting the same homeopathic treatment. He would have to re-test and adjust it according to the results. That's how he worked. But I did not wish to continue to travel. One other doctor/specialist had me on a typical protocol of high dose chlorella, high dose DMSA (3 times a week), which caused problems with me big time. And I hear others too.

So I moved on and got Andy's book and was then able to understand why I was having the problems I was having. One specialist has also read Andy Cutler's book and was so impressed, she photo copied it. They are constantly searching for a better protocol/ Why would this specialist who has been to mercury toxic conferences in US be interested in trying Andy Cutler's protocol if in fact she knew all there was to know? Or they had already hit on the ideal protocol for most people? Here is a guy less qualified than her and she photocopies his book........at least she was open enough and humble enough without allowing the letters after her name to send her ego soaring and deciding he was too beneath her to even read it. She was pretty impressed and admitted the protocol made sense. It doesn't mean she used it, I don't know what she does now, but she was open to give it a hearing. This is what a doctor should be. If they think they know all there is to know, we're in big trouble.

The other specialist "Dr Mike Godfrey" admitted to me that he did not wish to use DMSA, because he felt (at that time) there was no method known yet to prevent mercury redistribution into worse and more sensitive areas. he was well aware many of his colleagues used it. This guy was a specialist, still is and won't use the stuff. I don't know if he has heard of Cutler since.

I consider Andy a specialist considering his safety record and how many people are using the protocol and giving good reports. Reading his book and using his methods and finding they work, whilst others have many times failed doesn't make the apparent specialists look too good considering he's an apparent ignoramus? Or near enough to because he doesn't have the right letters after his name? One only has to look at his track record with kids and adults, both mercury poisoned and autistic to see his methods are catching on and doing well.

Andy actually works with doctors around the world on patients and many more are taking on his methods......He will not work with a patient unless the doctor is involved. However his book provides the clueless and those without the finance to have a way through this and so far I don't see many complaints about his information?

I've seen positive feedback the majority of the time.