Quote
Scientists (geologists/geochronologists) also use evidence to back up their claim that Mt Everest is very old. Their "educated guess" uses a lot more education/knowledge than guessing. You seem to be saying that they just made it up with no evidence to support it at all.

An analogy:

You are trying to determine a person's age. {snip}


I don't know, I have a bit of a problem with that analogy myself.

for instance, can you tell me how old this person was when he died before you click the link?

<img src="http://herballure.com/ForumExtras/Images/ebezowljhc.jpg">
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sfl-2004obits.gallery,0,6869671.photogallery?index=119

yeah, probably not. looks can be very deceiving, it's a very simplistic way of looking at things, to judge everything by face value.

hopefully Linda will never start collecting antiques because she'll probably end up with a house full of fakes given her tendency to determine origins by her desires.

I have no idea how MT Everest came to have seashells on top Linear, like I said above it's either one or the other, a flood covering the whole world, or the plates converging, or even a combination of both. there are not any other choices that I am aware of. I haven't made a decision on it. i don't foresee making one anytime soon either concerning that. So quit putting words in my mouth unless you would like me to do the same to you. though i doubt I would take the time to bother with something so dumb. Just a good way to start a fight.

you guys are good at that at least.

I would really like to see some photos of all your claims. it's not like glaciers are theory or anything, just the methods used to date them. did you see the photo of the rivers caused by glacier flow in summer in Iceland at that link I posted just above with the photo of Iceland in summer? Hefty bit of water for glaciers that never melt i'd say.