Just a couple of comments here, CTD:

Quote
Hypothesis: 'layers' or 'bands' in glaciers represent years. [color:"red"] Falsified [/color]
What has been shown is that not all layers are annual. This mundane fact holds for Greenland and Antarctica as well as most places on earth. It is about as fascinating as showing that cows eat grass and belch methane.

Quote
Amended hypothesis: Evolutionist experts can distinguish 'layers' or 'bands' which represent years from others and obtain accurate counts.[color:"red"] Falsified [/color]
Where? None of the "information" provided by SoSick is verified, nor (based on past experience) anything more than hearsay (argument from anonymous authority). Nothing has been done to address the markers in the ice that show annual changes that occur in the proportions of oxygen isotopes, dust and pollen layers or the kinds of ice produced during dark months.

Rather this is just another example of trying to distract people from the real evidence by talking about something different and not related.

Can you find evidence for young earth? of course, but that doesn't mean the earth is young it just means it is older than the evidence. All the evidence. and when you add it up, it doesn't take long to show that the YEC myth of a young earth is about as valid as a geocentric earth or even a flat earth -- after all you can find evidence to support them as well. All you have to do is ignore the evidence that refutes it.

Enjoy.