Quote
Hello CTD, nice to see you.

You seemed to miss something: What does you post have to do with the Quelccaya ice cap or the Dundee Ice cap? This old PRATT from greenland doesn't address the snowfall in other areas of the world, and it has already been done to death

How did they know to drill that deep? Because the thickness of the annual layers there was so deep. Annual layers have characteristics that are different from just another snow storm. Whether the snow is 5" or 15 feet those annual characteristics will tell you which are annual markers and which are just due to snow storms.
Well now, if it's "already been done to death", how is it you don't know they had to use sophisticated equipment in order to locate the aircraft? The readings told them how deep they'd have to dig, as I understand it.

See above for how evolutionists count "actual annual layers".
Quote
It really is a pity that all creationists can come up with for arguments are the same old tired PRATTS that have been around for years. Sad.

Scientists look at the evidence that shows annual deposits, which -- if you actually read the post above -- differ from local to local (the ones in S.America were .75 meters thick) and we haven't even gotten to Greenland yet.
It's really a pity that anyone at all continues to cling desperately to uniformitarianism, given its dismal track record. Coal, opals, oil, flowstone - all have been demonstrated to be capable of forming in far, far shorter amounts of time than previously speculated. And that's just off the top of my head.

Quote
Now -- question of the day -- can you deal with the evidence? I doubt it. For instance: why do the climate changes noted in the ice match exactly the climate markers from the varves in Lake Suigetsu for the same layers?
I decline to debunk your "varves" just now. I'm confident folks know how to use google, and my time-wasting quota's been spent reading LindaLou's quack.

Quote
How do you explain the correlation? Layer by layer by layer. Your greenland plane doesn't even begin to address that issue, and until you can explain the correlations - layer by layer by layer - you don't have an argument left worth wasting bandwidth to post.
From what I see, the evobunk's not worth much time - surely not worth all the money that's being spent just to add an obviously flawed argument to the global warming arsenal.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson