Quote
Not really. We look at the evidence of the peat mummies and we can KNOW that they were preserved long after they would otherwise have decayed by their clothes and artifacts. To assume this also applies to wood, which is harder to decay than flesh is nothing but looking at reality, especially when we see cloth, wood, fiber, clothes on the mummies. Whatever else these mummies show, they absolutely falsify the idea that wood cannot be preserved in peat bogs for a long time.


No argument here, but this is certainly a vastly different statement than the original that I responded to.


Quote
There is also always evidence FOR any theory. You can even find evidence FOR a flat earth - the question is what you do about contradictory evidence. Old things falsify a YEC model of the universe\earth, and they have to explain how that evidence has the appearance of age -- the evidence of the tree rings and the correlations that have been presented so far.


Especially today, when you do not know what is evidence and what is piltdown (a fraud).

The sheer amount of peer-reviewed fraud (even just that which we can be aware of) in the disciplines I study is mind boggling. There is an agenda at every door and it is an affront to science but good for quarterly corporate graphs.

[color:"brown"]"I am not satisfied that Darwin proved his point or that his influence in scientific and public thinking has been beneficial . . the success of Darwinism was accomplished by a decline in scientific integrity."[/color]

—W.R. Thompson, Introduction to *Charles Darwin's, Origin of the Species [Canadian scientist]. (emphasis mine)


Quote
Your two quotes involve evolution and not anything to do with this thread. They are irrelevant and immaterial to this discussion, and I would appreciate less clutter with extraneous information that can lead others to go off topic.


You're not shy about asking for what you want, are you?

Loosen up.


Quote
ps - sorry for the false accusation on the other thread.


Forgetaboutit.




[color:"brown"]"The hypothesis that life has developed from inorganic matter is, at present, still an article of faith."[/color]

—J.W.N. Sullivan, The Limitations of Science (1933), p. 95.


[color:"brown"]"The theory [of evolution] is a scientific mistake.' "[/color]

—Louis Agassiz, quoted in H. Enoch, Evolution or Creation, (1966), p. 139. [Agassiz was a Harvard University professor and the pioneer in glaciation.]


The Captian
Today they call you "crazy". Tomorrow they call you "ahead of your time."
Global Skywatch Learn about Chemtrails - You're breathing them now!
OnlyTheBestHerbs.com World-class supplements
Mercury Talk Why you are sick.
OneUp Domains Domains, Hosting, Email
1-800-358-4278 (U.S. & Canada)