Could I get an answer from any of the creationists here as to what they think about the change in hereditary traits in populations from generation to generation? Do you not believe that this happens? Does answering the question make you feel uncomfortable?
All sarcasm aside, I'll take a wild stab in the dark here. None of you are willing to discuss this.
You see, I'm not talking about mud moulding into man over the millenia. I simply want to know if you acknowledge the existing changes within the bloodline of a species over multiple generations. Even minutiae of changes - do you deny those?.
you are kidding right?
Of course genetic changes happen throughout generations. however, genetics and evolution are two different things. For instance, the genetic changes in a child born of a white man and a black woman, are not proof of evolution. There have not been any changes toward a new species, just inherited traits of the same species still.
Keep in mind, you are trying to prove evolution, not genetics or ancestry, to people who sincerely believe that God spoke this world into existence and created the life in it.
It's really not neccessary to endlessly reiterate your various views or definitons of what evolution is. We all know what evolution is, by various definitions as well.
the evilutionists however, have yet to show how man or cats or anything for that matter, evolved or developed from a different species of life or non-life or however they want to approach it.
and as we mentioned before, since no proof of this species change has occured in 150 years of hard searching, and yet during that time many thousands of people have found God, much to your disbelief but to them they are quite sure.... it's real important that you provide hard proof and facts to make a case. Unsubtantiated theories and ideas and personal opinions aren't going to cut it with anyone who already believes they had found the answer to life in God, even though you choose not to believe them.
you see, though you have chosen to disbelieve the experiences of other people, choose to not believe in God or that he created life, that is only your personal opinion. those who have found him have found the answers to these questions already. You cannot see God because he is spirit just as the bible says. yet somehow or another, people find him, someone somewhere, daily.
That is what you are up against if you haven't figured it out yet. You make a lot of accusations about creationists not wanting to discuss your views. I'd say, from my perspective the exact opposite is true. you have searched and searched for evidence of evilution, we have all been to school to some degree or another, we have all been exposed to these ideas, they are impossible to avoid. But, none of you has searched for God in a sincere way and found him. We have been on your side of the fence... we have gone further than that already and sought God, and we do know, He can be found. The evidence is staring you in the face daily and you refuse to see it. God is difficult to describe, there are a lot of things we don't understand people... yet, you will find that if you sincerely seek him, he can most definitely, ALWAYS be found.
You lack that experience, and as a result your opinions are generally biased with the lack of that knowledge.
That, guys, is the problem. It really is you, not the creationists. The creationists, through God, alreday have theor answer. If you want serious attention for your ideas of evolution you had better get serious about providing more proof to us than God has given each one of us. What you offer in exchange, is worthless junk, a pile of old sticky papers with scribbled notes. get real guys, it's not an offer anyone who has alreddy found God is interested in.
As long as you continue proposing ideas that are not actually evolution, such as the one above, you are seen, from this side, as skating the issue and trying to detract attention from your inadequacies. And so, we do not take you very seriously, sorry.
So... any prime rib on the hook today?
