Just to back up what RAZD is asking - and what myself and others have in the past asked without response..

Could I get an answer from any of the creationists here as to what they think about the change in hereditary traits in populations from generation to generation? Do you not believe that this happens? Does answering the question make you feel uncomfortable?

All sarcasm aside, I'll take a wild stab in the dark here. None of you are willing to discuss this.

You see, I'm not talking about mud moulding into man over the millenia. I simply want to know if you acknowledge the existing changes within the bloodline of a species over multiple generations. Even minutiae of changes - do you deny those?

Again, I find it highly unlikely any of the creationists are willing to even talk about this but I'm going to try asking anyway.

Incidentally, I am a religious person and I don't find that evolution challenges my beliefs. Ever. Religion and evolution are not incompatible (though, admittedly, they are incompatible with literal, word-for-word belief in the christian bible).

If I were a betting man I think I'd know where I'd lay my tips right about now. No creationist will answer this question directly. You can count on that.