|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 468
Advanced Master Member
|
Again I question your ability to read for comprehension. I clearly stated that we were only talking about the process of evolution at this point and not the theory. We'll get to that. To review, the process of evolution is the change in hereditary traits in populations from generation to generation. No I comprehend just fine. Evolution is evolution whether it is in theory or just relitivly defined. You will never convince me that a human life can over millions of years time turn into a rock. Not possible. That's the issue. Any thing else is distraction ... designed perhaps to hide your lies? It makes no difference what I say to you I am lying but the same falls true of you, to me you are lying. See if you can focus. Without plagiarizing. Well I just learned how to cut and paste so I thought I would try it out. Worked too. I got you all Razd up huh? Now I am a liar. I am sure you are just studying links as well. I mean are you the scientist that studied how the human turned into that rock? I did not realize you were the authority on that. I stand corrected. If you are that scientist then you should have some pics you could post, you know some in slow motion we could all watch. So do you have anything to say on the issue? Do you agree that this evolution - the change in hereditary traits in populations from generation to generation - is usable? How many times are ya gona define it for us? You would wear an old dead horse out wouldn't you? How bout those slo mo pics? I'm ready.
A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in pictures of silver.
|
|
|
|
|